<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Art, copyright and the beauty of inaccessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2006/04/13/art-copyright-and-the-beauty-of-inaccessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2006/04/13/art-copyright-and-the-beauty-of-inaccessibility/</link>
	<description>EthanZ's musings on Africa, media and international development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrienne</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2006/04/13/art-copyright-and-the-beauty-of-inaccessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-896272</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=487#comment-896272</guid>
		<description>Interesting work. I think the restrictions on photography is two fold.  I mean, you can&#039;t photograph work in a gallery, how is this any different?  Asides from the obvious of course?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting work. I think the restrictions on photography is two fold.  I mean, you can&#8217;t photograph work in a gallery, how is this any different?  Asides from the obvious of course?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Forster</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2006/04/13/art-copyright-and-the-beauty-of-inaccessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-10023</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Forster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=487#comment-10023</guid>
		<description>Seems to be some similarity between restrictions on photographing this art piece and restriction on photographs of performances of plays and musicals.

Clearly lots of culture benefits tremondously from widespread sharing.  Maybe some benefits from not being mixed (single malt?).

More important than the legal issues, IMO, is the personal integrity issue: if someone offers you access to their work, with certain restrictions, then you have some choices.  1) honor the restriction, 2) decide to not participate, 3) participate and then break your word.

  -- Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to be some similarity between restrictions on photographing this art piece and restriction on photographs of performances of plays and musicals.</p>
<p>Clearly lots of culture benefits tremondously from widespread sharing.  Maybe some benefits from not being mixed (single malt?).</p>
<p>More important than the legal issues, IMO, is the personal integrity issue: if someone offers you access to their work, with certain restrictions, then you have some choices.  1) honor the restriction, 2) decide to not participate, 3) participate and then break your word.</p>
<p>  &#8212; Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infobong.com &#187; linkdump for 2006-04-14</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2006/04/13/art-copyright-and-the-beauty-of-inaccessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-9929</link>
		<dc:creator>infobong.com &#187; linkdump for 2006-04-14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=487#comment-9929</guid>
		<description>[...] Art, copyright and the beauty of inaccessibility Ethan Zuckerman&#8217;s account of visiting Walter de Maria&#8217;s &#8220;Lightning Field&#8221; installation in rural New Mexico. The Dia Foundation, which manages the site, was criticized on bOINGbOING for restricting photography of the work. (del.icio.us tags: art copyright freeculture photography) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Art, copyright and the beauty of inaccessibility Ethan Zuckerman&#8217;s account of visiting Walter de Maria&#8217;s &#8220;Lightning Field&#8221; installation in rural New Mexico. The Dia Foundation, which manages the site, was criticized on bOINGbOING for restricting photography of the work. (del.icio.us tags: art copyright freeculture photography) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infobong.com &#187; linkdump for 2006-04-14</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2006/04/13/art-copyright-and-the-beauty-of-inaccessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-9930</link>
		<dc:creator>infobong.com &#187; linkdump for 2006-04-14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=487#comment-9930</guid>
		<description>[...] Art, copyright and the beauty of inaccessibility Ethan Zuckerman&#8217;s account of visiting Walter de Maria&#8217;s &#8220;Lightning Field&#8221; installation in rural New Mexico. The Dia Foundation, which manages the site, was criticized on bOINGbOING for restricting photography of the work. (del.icio.us tags: art copyright freeculture photography) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Art, copyright and the beauty of inaccessibility Ethan Zuckerman&#8217;s account of visiting Walter de Maria&#8217;s &#8220;Lightning Field&#8221; installation in rural New Mexico. The Dia Foundation, which manages the site, was criticized on bOINGbOING for restricting photography of the work. (del.icio.us tags: art copyright freeculture photography) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2006/04/13/art-copyright-and-the-beauty-of-inaccessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-9887</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=487#comment-9887</guid>
		<description>Basically I hadn&#039;t thought about Lightning Field for months - years, perhaps - until Cory brought it up. I was initially frustrated with his reaction, then realized that it wasn&#039;t all that different from my reaction when I&#039;d simply heard about the piece. So I really wrote it to try to engage him in a conversation, not so much to say anything sweeping about digitization and access... though you&#039;ve now got me thinking about that topic as well... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically I hadn&#8217;t thought about Lightning Field for months &#8211; years, perhaps &#8211; until Cory brought it up. I was initially frustrated with his reaction, then realized that it wasn&#8217;t all that different from my reaction when I&#8217;d simply heard about the piece. So I really wrote it to try to engage him in a conversation, not so much to say anything sweeping about digitization and access&#8230; though you&#8217;ve now got me thinking about that topic as well&#8230; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtl3p</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2006/04/13/art-copyright-and-the-beauty-of-inaccessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-9885</link>
		<dc:creator>mtl3p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=487#comment-9885</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I&#039;m just wondering what motivated you to write this now?  I&#039;m curious because I&#039;m feeling increasingly ambivalent about my role as a proponent of access, and of digitizing things to increase access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just wondering what motivated you to write this now?  I&#8217;m curious because I&#8217;m feeling increasingly ambivalent about my role as a proponent of access, and of digitizing things to increase access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

