<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multitouch goes widescreen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/03/07/multitouch-goes-widescreen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/03/07/multitouch-goes-widescreen/</link>
	<description>EthanZ's musings on Africa, media and international development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oskar L-B</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/03/07/multitouch-goes-widescreen/comment-page-1/#comment-174665</link>
		<dc:creator>Oskar L-B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=1284#comment-174665</guid>
		<description>No word on availability from Jeff yet? Last I heard he was setting up shop to get these amazing technologies to market ASAP. I really hope that&#039;s still the case. Sure the iPhone is cool, but Apple can&#039;t do everything. Apple&#039;s greatest legacy is to inspire others to make intuitive interfaces; something Jeff Han is a child of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No word on availability from Jeff yet? Last I heard he was setting up shop to get these amazing technologies to market ASAP. I really hope that&#8217;s still the case. Sure the iPhone is cool, but Apple can&#8217;t do everything. Apple&#8217;s greatest legacy is to inspire others to make intuitive interfaces; something Jeff Han is a child of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/03/07/multitouch-goes-widescreen/comment-page-1/#comment-174569</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=1284#comment-174569</guid>
		<description>I think the iPhone will be the first consumer item with this kind of touch.  It will be interesting to see what the problems and successes are as people get used to this new way of interacting with displays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the iPhone will be the first consumer item with this kind of touch.  It will be interesting to see what the problems and successes are as people get used to this new way of interacting with displays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/03/07/multitouch-goes-widescreen/comment-page-1/#comment-173783</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=1284#comment-173783</guid>
		<description>Mike, I don&#039;t have a pixel count for resolution, but I&#039;ll try to get it for you. He was showing 250 You Tube videos at once in very small windows - it wasn&#039;t being shown full screen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I don&#8217;t have a pixel count for resolution, but I&#8217;ll try to get it for you. He was showing 250 You Tube videos at once in very small windows &#8211; it wasn&#8217;t being shown full screen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/03/07/multitouch-goes-widescreen/comment-page-1/#comment-173692</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=1284#comment-173692</guid>
		<description>Ethan

Couid you explain what you mean by &quot;better resolution than HD&quot;? 

What resolution was the video?

If videos from YouTune were used, the typical resolution is 320 x 240, how was this scaled to &quot;better resolution than HD&quot;? 

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan</p>
<p>Couid you explain what you mean by &#8220;better resolution than HD&#8221;? </p>
<p>What resolution was the video?</p>
<p>If videos from YouTune were used, the typical resolution is 320 x 240, how was this scaled to &#8220;better resolution than HD&#8221;? </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

