<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-04-23</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/04/23/links-for-2007-04-23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/04/23/links-for-2007-04-23/</link>
	<description>EthanZ's musings on Africa, media and international development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: quixote</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/04/23/links-for-2007-04-23/comment-page-1/#comment-223606</link>
		<dc:creator>quixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=1396#comment-223606</guid>
		<description>The Food-and-Supermarkets link is an excellent article.  One point Pollan doesn&#039;t explicitly make is critical.  He notes that the &quot;farm&quot; bill, which is the culprit behind the skewed subsidies, is really a food bill, and that it concerns eaters as well as farmers.  Only problem is: everyone&#039;s an eater, but only 2% or so are farmers.  At current rates, 60%-70% of eaters would not vote for Republicans or that agenda.  

If the subsidies changed, the Republicans would lose the farming states they&#039;ve been buying for so long.  

It could be the end of the Republican party if they had so few Senators you wouldn&#039;t even need to use your toes as well as fingers to count them.

There&#039;s even more than an agribusiness empire at stake here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Food-and-Supermarkets link is an excellent article.  One point Pollan doesn&#8217;t explicitly make is critical.  He notes that the &#8220;farm&#8221; bill, which is the culprit behind the skewed subsidies, is really a food bill, and that it concerns eaters as well as farmers.  Only problem is: everyone&#8217;s an eater, but only 2% or so are farmers.  At current rates, 60%-70% of eaters would not vote for Republicans or that agenda.  </p>
<p>If the subsidies changed, the Republicans would lose the farming states they&#8217;ve been buying for so long.  </p>
<p>It could be the end of the Republican party if they had so few Senators you wouldn&#8217;t even need to use your toes as well as fingers to count them.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s even more than an agribusiness empire at stake here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

