<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-09-23</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/</link>
	<description>EthanZ's musings on Africa, media and international development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ccjrnl &#187; Unintended consequences: donated mosquito net edition</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/comment-page-1/#comment-866605</link>
		<dc:creator>ccjrnl &#187; Unintended consequences: donated mosquito net edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/#comment-866605</guid>
		<description>[...] Ethan Zuckerman points to a Zambian blogger claiming donated mosquito nets are used by fishermen for destructive drag-netting in rivers and streams. A bit of googling turns up similar stories in Namibia and Rwanda. I wonder if these are marginal cases or if the practice is truly widespread, and if people who pay for mosquito nets are less likely to use them in this way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ethan Zuckerman points to a Zambian blogger claiming donated mosquito nets are used by fishermen for destructive drag-netting in rivers and streams. A bit of googling turns up similar stories in Namibia and Rwanda. I wonder if these are marginal cases or if the practice is truly widespread, and if people who pay for mosquito nets are less likely to use them in this way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newthinking communications</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/comment-page-1/#comment-562352</link>
		<dc:creator>newthinking communications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/#comment-562352</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web2forDev - Interview mit Ethan Zuckerman&lt;/strong&gt;


Ethan Zuckerman ist Mitgründer von Global Voices Online und Geekcorps. Am Berkman Center for Internet and Society arbeitet er an Projekten wie den Global Attention Profiles. Er ist bekannt für sein ausführliches Live Blogging von Konferenzen. Mitte de</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web2forDev &#8211; Interview mit Ethan Zuckerman</strong></p>
<p>Ethan Zuckerman ist Mitgründer von Global Voices Online und Geekcorps. Am Berkman Center for Internet and Society arbeitet er an Projekten wie den Global Attention Profiles. Er ist bekannt für sein ausführliches Live Blogging von Konferenzen. Mitte de</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I.P.A. Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/comment-page-1/#comment-549425</link>
		<dc:creator>I.P.A. Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/#comment-549425</guid>
		<description>Of course we do need quantitative data, but the evidence of widespread use is here for those of us with field projects to judge; a friend recetnly saw a net which was 100 metres or so long. We are a country of lakes, rivers and wetlands, now with a much denuded fishery. I am seeing crocodile taking people in rivers where it was virtually unknown in the dry season. Sachs is a misguided control freak from central planning who is the chap responsible for the plan to spend $1.5 billion every five years on mossy nets. He is an economist whom Esterley has rightly taken to task. We need the judicious use of DDT, and direct aid to decentralized power structures and people as an incentive to meaningful advancement. 

Why was an impact assessment not done before Sachs advanced on his plan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we do need quantitative data, but the evidence of widespread use is here for those of us with field projects to judge; a friend recetnly saw a net which was 100 metres or so long. We are a country of lakes, rivers and wetlands, now with a much denuded fishery. I am seeing crocodile taking people in rivers where it was virtually unknown in the dry season. Sachs is a misguided control freak from central planning who is the chap responsible for the plan to spend $1.5 billion every five years on mossy nets. He is an economist whom Esterley has rightly taken to task. We need the judicious use of DDT, and direct aid to decentralized power structures and people as an incentive to meaningful advancement. </p>
<p>Why was an impact assessment not done before Sachs advanced on his plan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo H.</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/comment-page-1/#comment-549153</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/#comment-549153</guid>
		<description>I thought you might also be interested in the new &quot;Give 1, Get 1&quot; marketing program by OLPC:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/24/business/worldbusiness/24laptop.html?ex=1348286400&amp;en=6eb66ac85f2870d0&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you might also be interested in the new &#8220;Give 1, Get 1&#8243; marketing program by OLPC:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/24/business/worldbusiness/24laptop.html?ex=1348286400&#038;en=6eb66ac85f2870d0&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/24/business/worldbusiness/24laptop.html?ex=1348286400&#038;en=6eb66ac85f2870d0&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Gorman</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/comment-page-1/#comment-548170</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/09/23/links-for-2007-09-23/#comment-548170</guid>
		<description>Re bednets for fishing. I keep hearing variations on this anecdote (using donated bednets for catching fish or as bridal veils) but don&#039;t have a sense of how widespread that particular problem is. 

What I do know is that this story is used a lot as part of a long-running argument between economists Jeff Sachs and Bill Easterly, among others, over whether or not it&#039;s better to charge poor people for bed nets or provide them for free. 

The Lancet just published a paper (22 Sept. 2007) by Greg Fegan and company showing a 44% drop in deaths in four Kenyan districts with free mass distribution of nets. 

Also, I&#039;ve read about an MIT Poverty Lab study that&#039;s trying to sort the question with direct comparisons (more research is always the answer, don&#039;t you know).

Still leaves the issue of how many bed nets are being used improperly and whether that&#039;s enough to sink the whole effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re bednets for fishing. I keep hearing variations on this anecdote (using donated bednets for catching fish or as bridal veils) but don&#8217;t have a sense of how widespread that particular problem is. </p>
<p>What I do know is that this story is used a lot as part of a long-running argument between economists Jeff Sachs and Bill Easterly, among others, over whether or not it&#8217;s better to charge poor people for bed nets or provide them for free. </p>
<p>The Lancet just published a paper (22 Sept. 2007) by Greg Fegan and company showing a 44% drop in deaths in four Kenyan districts with free mass distribution of nets. </p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve read about an MIT Poverty Lab study that&#8217;s trying to sort the question with direct comparisons (more research is always the answer, don&#8217;t you know).</p>
<p>Still leaves the issue of how many bed nets are being used improperly and whether that&#8217;s enough to sink the whole effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

