<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pop!Tech: Acceleration and managing AIDS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/10/19/poptech-acceleration-and-managing-aids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/10/19/poptech-acceleration-and-managing-aids/</link>
	<description>EthanZ's musings on Africa, media and international development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/10/19/poptech-acceleration-and-managing-aids/comment-page-1/#comment-2434477</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/10/19/poptech-acceleration-and-managing-aids/#comment-2434477</guid>
		<description>After reading Kentaro Toyama&#039;s recent article in The Atlantic about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/03/technology-is-not-the-answer/73065/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Technology is not the Answer&lt;/a&gt; to many international development challenges (at least in the absence of &quot;right intent and capacity&quot; in the people involved), I was reminded of Zinny and Krista&#039;s fabulously inspiring presentation at PopTech 2007, and their photos of broken kiosks and other examples of well-intentioned technology from wealthy nations failing to deliver results because it wasn&#039;t really designed with an understanding of the intended users&#039; context. 

The presentation that immediately followed of the &quot;rich-media, video-driven&quot; Life Windows - which seemed to perfectly fit the very description of well-intentioned but failed technology - was one of the most significant instances of cognitive dissonance I&#039;ve experienced at a conference (even now I shudder to remember it), and was made all the more striking by the PopTech context, which was [otherwise] all about connections vs. disconnects.

Anyhow, I can&#039;t find any trace of Zinny and Krista&#039;s talk on the PopTech site ... and am wondering whether that is an intentional omission or an unintentional oversight. In any case, I was hoping to find corroboration of my memory here on this post, but perhaps I am misremembering [aspects of] the event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading Kentaro Toyama&#8217;s recent article in The Atlantic about <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/03/technology-is-not-the-answer/73065/" rel="nofollow">Technology is not the Answer</a> to many international development challenges (at least in the absence of &#8220;right intent and capacity&#8221; in the people involved), I was reminded of Zinny and Krista&#8217;s fabulously inspiring presentation at PopTech 2007, and their photos of broken kiosks and other examples of well-intentioned technology from wealthy nations failing to deliver results because it wasn&#8217;t really designed with an understanding of the intended users&#8217; context. </p>
<p>The presentation that immediately followed of the &#8220;rich-media, video-driven&#8221; Life Windows &#8211; which seemed to perfectly fit the very description of well-intentioned but failed technology &#8211; was one of the most significant instances of cognitive dissonance I&#8217;ve experienced at a conference (even now I shudder to remember it), and was made all the more striking by the PopTech context, which was [otherwise] all about connections vs. disconnects.</p>
<p>Anyhow, I can&#8217;t find any trace of Zinny and Krista&#8217;s talk on the PopTech site &#8230; and am wondering whether that is an intentional omission or an unintentional oversight. In any case, I was hoping to find corroboration of my memory here on this post, but perhaps I am misremembering [aspects of] the event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Oso &#187; Archive &#187; PopTech Innovation Fellows: From Conversation to Social Change</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/10/19/poptech-acceleration-and-managing-aids/comment-page-1/#comment-1253255</link>
		<dc:creator>El Oso &#187; Archive &#187; PopTech Innovation Fellows: From Conversation to Social Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/10/19/poptech-acceleration-and-managing-aids/#comment-1253255</guid>
		<description>[...] from stirring conversation to supporting social change is with its Accelerator program. As Ethan wrote last year when it was announced: Zolli wants to refocus Pop!Tech around a new project, the Pop!Tech accelerator. This is a project [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from stirring conversation to supporting social change is with its Accelerator program. As Ethan wrote last year when it was announced: Zolli wants to refocus Pop!Tech around a new project, the Pop!Tech accelerator. This is a project [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swaziland &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Stationery, free paper mill of email depapeteryfo</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/10/19/poptech-acceleration-and-managing-aids/comment-page-1/#comment-597175</link>
		<dc:creator>Swaziland &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Stationery, free paper mill of email depapeteryfo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/10/19/poptech-acceleration-and-managing-aids/#comment-597175</guid>
		<description>[...] Pop!Tech: Acceleration and managing AIDS Is it enough to come together and talk about important scientific, social and technical issues? That’s a question that Andrew Zolli, curator of Pop!Tech has been wrestling with for the past few years. Conferences like Pop!Tech have the possibility of sparking collaborations - in a new phase of Pop!Tech, &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pop!Tech: Acceleration and managing AIDS Is it enough to come together and talk about important scientific, social and technical issues? That’s a question that Andrew Zolli, curator of Pop!Tech has been wrestling with for the past few years. Conferences like Pop!Tech have the possibility of sparking collaborations &#8211; in a new phase of Pop!Tech, &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jm123</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/10/19/poptech-acceleration-and-managing-aids/comment-page-1/#comment-583651</link>
		<dc:creator>jm123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2007/10/19/poptech-acceleration-and-managing-aids/#comment-583651</guid>
		<description>The &#039;Third Wave&#039; of the conference is a very ripe idea, nearly overdue. Glad to see it happening!

jm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;Third Wave&#8217; of the conference is a very ripe idea, nearly overdue. Glad to see it happening!</p>
<p>jm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

